Post-Award Considerations

Once your research proposal has been funded, certain research security considerations may become relevant to your project throughout its lifecycle:

Changes to the nature of the research

For all projects funded by the Tri-Agencies and/or Canada Foundation for Innovation

Changes

If the nature of the research changes at any point in the project, consider whether it could now be “aiming to advance” one of the Government of Canada’s designated sensitive technology research areas1. Such a change would make the funded research subject to the federal Policy on Sensitive Technology Research and Affiliations of Concern (STRAC Policy) and will require attestation forms from researchers with named roles.

Consult UBC's Federal Policy Self-Check as a starting place to determine if the project may now be subject to research security requirements.

Changes to project leadership

For projects that are aiming to advance sensitive technology research areas

changes to leadership

Persons with named roles on the grant are prohibited from affiliating with any of the organizations that the federal government has identified as posing a risk to Canada’s national security (called Named Research Organizations). This means the researcher(s) cannot take appointments at, employment from or conduct research at, a Named Research Organization. Persons with named roles also cannot receive funding or in-kind support from those organizations. For CFI grants, only team/project leaders and team members are subject to this requirement. The above conditions only apply for funded projects aiming to advance sensitive technology research areas.

Advise the funding agency of any changes to named roles or project/team leaders and team members, as each of them may be required to submit an attestation form and comply with the STRAC policy.

Individual team member obligations

For projects that are aiming to advance sensitive technology research areas

secure team

Each research team member, regardless of whether they completed an attestation form, is individually responsible to ensure they are not affiliated with, or receiving funding or in-kind support from, Named Research Organizations. All researchers that become involved with the project at any stage, including Highly Qualified Personnel, are subject to this requirement. Potential team members holding active affiliations with Named Research Organizations would need to end those affiliations to be eligible to participate in federally funded research that is subject to the STRAC policy.

The NRO and STRAC lists that were public at the time you applied for the grant are relevant for the duration of your funded research. New lists may become relevant if or when you seek to reapply or renew.

New private sector partners or changes to identified risks

For projects involving private-sector partners

decorative

When new partners join the project, identify any potential security risks from the partner, including conflicts of interest and affiliations that could compromise the integrity of the research. For CFI-funded projects, identify each partner's contribution to the research and the names/roles of involved employees. If the risks change from those you identified in your original risk assessment form, you may have to develop a new risk mitigation plan.

Notify the relevant granting agency if new partners become involved that were not named on the original grant application, or if new risks arise. The agency will determine whether you may need to submit additional research security documentation before proceeding with the project.

Implementation of risk mitigation plans

For projects involving private-sector partners

follow the plan

If you submitted a risk mitigation plan as part of the grant application’s risk assessment form, be sure to follow and implement the plan. As the project evolves, if new risks are identified you should apply all relevant measures to ensure the integrity of your research. 

Share the risk mitigation plan with relevant team members and implement all steps to mitigate the identified risks.

Post-award validation

For projects that are aiming to advance sensitive technology research areas

Your forms may be validated

After the funding has been awarded, granting agencies can validate attestations for accuracy and compliance. Researchers found to be non-compliant could face significant repercussions, up to and including loss of funds or becoming ineligible to receive future federal funding.
In cases where inaccurate information is uncovered, the relevant granting agency will determine how best to proceed while minimizing potential impacts to the project.

Each researcher is responsible for remaining compliant throughout the granting period. If you become aware that your attestation was inaccurate, take steps to end all affiliations with NROs and inform the agency promptly.

Download the Post-Award Guide


UBC Crest The official logo of the University of British Columbia. Urgent Message An exclamation mark in a speech bubble. Caret An arrowhead indicating direction. Arrow An arrow indicating direction. Arrow in Circle An arrow indicating direction. Arrow in Circle An arrow indicating direction. Chats Two speech clouds. Facebook The logo for the Facebook social media service. Information The letter 'i' in a circle. Instagram The logo for the Instagram social media service. External Link An arrow entering a square. Linkedin The logo for the LinkedIn social media service. Location Pin A map location pin. Mail An envelope. Menu Three horizontal lines indicating a menu. Minus A minus sign. Telephone An antique telephone. Plus A plus symbol indicating more or the ability to add. Search A magnifying glass. Twitter The logo for the Twitter social media service. Youtube The logo for the YouTube video sharing service.